Photo: Mitchell Clark

On the surface, Fujifilm's recently announced X-E5 looks like a very familiar setup in a new body. Its combination of 40MP BSI CMOS sensor and processor has shown up in several previous Fujifilm cameras, such as the X-T5, X-T50, X-H2 and X100VI. Theoretically, that means it should provide very similar, but since we like to be thorough, we put a production copy in front of our test scene so we could make sure.

Our test scene is designed to simulate a variety of textures, colors, and detail types you'll encounter in the real world. It also has two illumination modes, full even light and low directional light, to see the effect of different lighting conditions.

As expected, the X-E5's Raw detail capture is identical to Fujifilm's other 40MP cameras, and it outperforms the 24MP Nikon Z5II and 26MP Sony a6700. Its images also have more detail than those from its 26MP predecessor, the X-E4.

Its base ISO noise performance is on par with the rest of the current-gen APS-C competition, and it's a bit cleaner than the X-E4; no surprise, given that its base ISO is 125 while its predecessors was 160. The full-frame Z5II, however, provides around a stop improvement in noise, which follows its increased sensor area.

These trends continue at mid to high ISOs, and the X-E5's lead in detail slips away past around ISO 1600.

The camera's JPEG engine isn't quite as good as its competitors at emphasizing fine details, even at base ISOs, so its lead isn't as apparent as it is in Raw. However, it continues Fujifilm's tradition of offering pleasing colors and does a decent job of retaining details even while reducing noise at higher ISOs, though its performance does suffer a bit in low-contrast areas.

Dynamic Range

This sensor has always offered excellent dynamic range with low read noise, and it's no different in the X-E5.

Exposure Latitude | ISO Invariance

This means it offers plenty of room to bring up shadows in post, so you can make the most of its maximum dynamic range at base ISO. Its design also lets you choose to extend dynamic range when shooting in low-light scenes, as long as you're willing to use a lower ISO to reduce blown highlights.

As expected, the X-E5 doesn't offer anything new in terms of image quality, though that's not necessarily a bad thing. Fujifilm's current generation of cameras have long been strong contenders in that department, and if you're trying to decide between them you only have to consider form factor and feature sets. If you don't prefer the rangefinder-styling, you're not giving up image quality by going with an X-T50 or X-T5 instead.